Xero Shoes Mesa Trail vs. Terraflex II – Which trail shoe fits your foot?

When it comes to minimal trail running shoes, there aren’t many options on the market. Xero Shoes knew that needed to change, so they released 2 completely different trail options.

In this review, I will go over the basics of the Xero Shoes Mesa Trail and the Xero Shoes Terraflex II, highlight the key differences, and explain the different situations in which these shoes excel. 

For more in-depth reviews of both shoes, check out the full reviews in the links below.

Terraflex review card

Xero Shoes Terraflex II

The minimal trail shoe with ultimate protection

  • $109.99
  • Weight: 8.9 oz/ 252 g
  • Stack Height: 3 mm + 6.5 mm outsole rubber
  • True to size
  • Wide Toebox, high volume
  • Lots of toe/foot protection
Xero Shoes Mesa Trail

Xero Shoes Mesa Trail

The closest to barefoot you’re going to get.

  • $119.99
  • Weight: 7.6 oz/ 215 g
  • Stack Height: 5.5 mm outsole rubber
  • Order 1/2 size larger
  • Wide Toebox, high volume
  • Flexible forgiving upper
  • Strategically placed overlays.

The Fit

Aside from the size discrepancy, the overall shape of the shoes are similar. If you’ve read reviews about the Mesa Trail, you’ll know they fit small. And that’s why you should buy at least ½ size larger than your standard (I’ve even gone a full size larger). Whereas the Terraflex II fits true to size. 

Nice deep and moderately wide toe boxes. Often barefoot shoes lack depth even if they have width, but that’s not true here. With a sturdy protective toe box on the Mesa Trail and Terraflex II, the structure holds the toebox high above your toes to offer, freeing wiggle room.

The material differences set these shoes apart in performance but also fit. Because the Mesa Trail is aimed at the performance-based lightweight market, the thin materials mold perfectly around the foot, offering a sock-like feeling. The Terraflex II is made with durability and protection in mind, and the thick overlays contribute to a stiffer, more secure fit. Meaning there’s less freedom in barefoot movement. 

If your feet are low in volume or not too wide, you should look at other brands. While Xero shoes aren’t the widest on the market, they are pretty voluminous and broader than other brands, such as Vivobarefoot.

Lockdown is near perfect for the Mesa Trail, and the Terraflex II isn’t too far behind. Because the materials around the ankle cuff are relatively flexible on both shoes, it’s possible to lock your feet tight without worrying about slippage. This benefit is further enhanced by the Mesa Trails, where the super flexible materials hug the foot like a sock. 

Which minimal running shoe is for you?

Take a quick 5-question quiz to identify the perfect minimal running shoe for your feet! You'll get both road and trail options based on your answers!


The Feel

The Mesa Trails are for you if you want the authentic barefoot feel. With only a few millimeters of stack height difference, you’d expect the feel in both shoes to be similar. But that couldn’t be further from the truth. The flex in the Mesa Trails are the best I’ve ever put on my feet.

Need more protection? Opt for the Terraflex II. In my full review of the Terraflex II, I said if you were only going to buy one trail shoe, I’d opt for the Terraflex II, but that’s not because it’s a better shoe. It has all the protection you may want on rough technical trails. If you took the Mesa Trails on rugged trails, you might find it a little uncomfortable. 

To transition from traditional shoes, the Terraflex II is a good option. With slightly less flex and a little more stack height, the Terraflex II performs more like a traditional shoe than any other minimal shoe. There are pros and cons to this, but if you’re transitioning, it could be a positive.

The Durability

When it comes to outsoles, the Terraflex II takes home the trophy. With both shoes having a 5000-mile sole guarantee, you’d expect both outsoles to be similar. But I’ve found the Mesa Trail to have a much softer rubber and wear much quicker. I’ve got no doubt that the Terraflex outsole will continue far past the Mesa Trail.

Sadly the upper on my Terraflex II and Mesa Trails broke down after 400 miles. While those numbers aren’t bad for other brands, much of the shoe could have continued past this. For the Terraflex, I’ve managed to continue with a ripped forefoot, but the separation in the Mesa Trails meant I had to buy another pair. 

Watch for the Terraflex II insoles and midsole packing out. I took the Terraflex shoes out on the Colorado Trail with me, where I moved for 30 miles daily. Obviously, they would break down fast in those conditions, but I found the insole was causing huge issues with sore spots. I’d suggest swapping these out soon after purchase. On top of that, the minimal foam in the Terraflex II was packed out, and the ridge of the seem was exposed. I believe if the insoles were better quality, this would not have been an issue. 

Conclusion

In the end, the decision is easy. 

  • If you want protection and you’re going to be running on rough technical trails, choose the Xero Shoes Terraflex II.
  • If you’re looking for a true barefoot experience, choose the Xero Shoe Mesa Trails. 

I enjoy both shoes, but the Mesa Trails’ flexibility wins out on nearly every run. And if I know I’ll be running hard downhill on rocky terrain, I’d consider the Terraflex II. 

Terraflex review card

Xero Shoes Terraflex II

The minimal trail shoe with ultimate protection

Xero Shoes Mesa Trail

Xero Shoes Mesa Trail

The closest to barefoot you’re going to get.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.